فهرست مطالب
Acknowledgments\nPart I: Narrative progression: From discourse connectivity to event partitivity\n 1 Preliminary thoughts: Narrative discourse\n 2 Prominence: A look at ‘now’\n 2.1 Challenges to Kamp\'s principle\n 2.2 Time prominence account of ‘now’\n 2.2.1 Coherence and temporal anaphora\n 2.2.2 Beyond the time prominence account of ‘now’\n 2.3 ‘Now’ seeks prominent final states\n 2.4 Two consequences of the proposal\n 2.4.1 Is `now\' a pure indexical?\n 2.4.2 Times versus states\n 3 Coherence: A look at narration and result\n 3.1 Delimiting the task\n 3.2 narration and result\n 3.2.1 Hobbs1985 on occasion\n 3.2.2 The definition of narration\n 3.2.3 The definition of result\n 3.2.4 A minimal ontology\n 3.2.5 The relationship between narration and result\n 3.3 Abducing structural constraints on EDUs\n 3.3.1 Structural laws\n 3.3.2 Possibilities for EDUs\n Appendices\n A Narrative progression with statives?\n B Derivations\n B.1 Deriving\n B.2 Absurd consequences\nPart II: Semantics and pragmatics of tense: The nuts and bolts\n 4 Cessation and double access\n 4.1 Temporal implicatures and temporal profile of statives\n 4.2 Semantics of tense: First pass\n 4.3 Double access\n 4.3.1 Cessation and parentheticality\n 4.3.2 Two complications\n 4.3.3 Abusch\'s account of double access Heim-style\n 4.3.4 The meaning of the present tense revisited\n 4.4 Calculating cessation in embedded contexts\n 5 Sequence of tense\n 5.1 Relative present\n 5.2 Simultaneous readings and tense shifting\n 5.3 Alleged simultaneity with the progressive\n 5.4 Final words on tense shifting: Evidence for and against\n 5.5 ULC and beyond\n 6 Concluding thoughts: Ways of composing with viewpoint aspect\n 6.1 Towards a compositional semantics\n 6.2 Viewpoint aspect\n 6.2.1 The neo-Kleinian and Bach/Krifka analyses\n 6.2.2 Comparing the two analyses\n Bibliography
